Thursday, May 13, 2010

THERE IT IS Jayne Cortez

At the outset this poem strikes the leftist cord in me. The poem seems to start in the middle of a thought since it starts with "And". I get a feel that I entered a room in the middle of a conversation. She speaks poignantly and her statements are thought provoking. The poem begins telling the listener that: If we don't… resist, organize and unify, get the power to control then we will… she tells of the consequences. The 'ifs' are quite matter of fact, while the 'thens' are emphasized by the use of strong adjectives such as exaggerated, bizarre, dehumanized, decomposed to describe captivity, submission, suicide, fear, repression. She uses repetition to further exaggerate her point, "if we, if we, if we"' and, "the, the, the, and the" and towards the conclusion, forever and ever and ever. She then repeats the last sentence with the same start of the first sentence of the poem "And".

1 comment:

  1. Good observations. What do you make of that repetition of "and"? It at first suggests a too neat closure, whereas much of the poem works against such closure? or does it suggest socio-eonomic entrapment of some sort? I guess I'm wondering if its use is ironic, or fatalistic, or perhaps challenging the notion of formal, poetic closure--a halmark of conventional, print-bound, should we say "white," anglo-Amerian poetic tradition...

    See comments on Andrea, Constanza...

    ReplyDelete